Governance

SBOL is being developed by a collegial volunteer organization, which runs primarily by rough consensus. As an organization, the SBOL development community holds the following values:

SBOL Organization

The SBOL community has the following organization:

SBOL Development Group

Membership in the SBOL Development Group is open to all interested parties. Individuals interested in joining the group should contact the editors (sbol-editors@googlegroups.com).

The SBOL Development Group as a whole is the ultimate authority and source of legitimacy for SBOL standards decisions. All elections, standards changes, and governance changes are voted on by the SBOL Development Group according to the procedures below.

The primary means of communication for the SBOL Development Group is via the sbol-dev Google Group. All significant decisions on governance and the evolution of the standard must be discussed via this mailing list.

SBOL workshops should be held twice per year. These may be stand-alone workshops or in combination with another event, but must provide ample time for attending members to hold focused discussions on the development of SBOL.

All members of the SBOL Development Group are encouraged (but not required) to:

  1. Attend the SBOL Workshops and other meetings
  2. Participate in discussions on SBOL mailing lists
  3. Support the SBOL standard in any tools and systems they work on
  4. Provide constructive feedback for improving the standard

Ad-Hoc Subgroups

Certain activities of the SBOL community are expected to either generate noticeably higher volumes of communication (e.g., software development and support) or to address topics expected to be of interest only to certain special interest groups. When deemed appropriate, ad-hoc subgroups may be created for addressing such topics.

Subgroups must communicate via open lists that may be readily accessed and joined by any member of the SBOL Development Group. Any communication regarding standards changes, however, should be migrated back to the SBOL Development Group mailing list.

SBOL Editors

As a matter of pragmatism, many organizational decisions and actions are delegated to an elected group of SBOL Editors, so named because their primary responsibility is ensuring the effective curation of documents for the community.

The responsibilities of the SBOL Editors are:

The SBOL Editors shall hold weekly meetings to coordinate their execution of these responsibilities. These meetings should be open, and their minutes should be reported to the SBOL Development Group.

The SBOL Editors mailing list is sbol-editors@googlegroups.com. Editorial communications should generally use this list to preserve records and aid organization. To preserve organizational memory, former editors are kept on the mailing list until they choose to remove themselves.

SBOL Editors are elected by a community vote, following the process below. Editors serve for a two year term and cannot serve terms consecutively. To maximize continuity, editors’ terms should be desynchronized. There are 5 editorial positions, currently held by:

Previous SBOL Editors include: Bryan Bartley (University of Washington), Jacob Beal (BBN Technologies), Kevin Clancy (ThermoFisher), Michal Galdzicki (University of Washington),
 Goksel Misirli (Newcastle University), Ernst Oberortner (Boston University),
 Matthew Pocock, (Newcastle University), Jacqueline Quinn (Google), Cesar Rodriguez (Autodesk), 
Mandy Wilson (Virginia Bioinformatics Institute)

SBOL Chair and Steering Committee


The positions of SBOL Chair and Steering Committee are a means for organizing strategic planning and coordination amongst PI-level members of the SBOL community.

The SBOL Chair is the head of the SBOL Steering Committee. The SBOL Chair is responsible for ensuring regular steering committee meetings are held, for effective moderation of these meetings, and for being an advertised public point of contact for outside organizations.

The SBOL Chair is elected by a community vote, following the process below. Chairs serve for a four year term. In order to ensure a smooth working relationship between the SBOL Chair and SBOL Editors, the SBOL Editors can remove a chair by a no-confidence vote amongst the SBOL Editors at any time.

The rest of the SBOL Steering Committee is appointed (and removed) by the SBOL Chair. The Steering Committee has no fixed size or fixed term, but should generally comprise the set of PI-level members who are strongly active, have a strong stake in SBOL, and are willing to assume community leadership responsibilities.

The SBOL Steering Committee shall hold monthly meetings to coordinate around strategic issues for the community (e.g., funding, setting key priorities and goals). These meetings should be open, and their minutes should be reported to the SBOL Development Group. The SBOL Steering Committee should also convene an external advisory board to help maintain strategic links with other communities and to obtain useful advice in guiding the community.

The SBOL Steering Committee mailing list is sbol-steering@googlegroups.com. Communications should generally use this list to preserve records and aid organization. To preserve organizational memory, former chairs and members are kept on the mailing list until they choose to remove themselves.

The SBOL Chair is currently:

Previous Chairs:

The SBOL Steering Committee is currently (listed alphabetically):

The SBOL chair has also organized an international advisory panel comprising a range of experts in standards and synthetic biology. The panel will provide an external perspective for SBOL, with advice on how SBOL can grow to meet the needs of the wider community.

The SBOL Advisory Panel is currently (listed alphabetically):

Voting Procedures

Elections Process:

  1. Before any election, there is a nomination period of 5 working days.
  2. All members of the SBOL Development Group are eligible for all offices (except those that are term-limited).
  3. Any member can self-nominate or can nominate any other member.
  4. Voting runs for 5 working days, starting at the end of the nomination period. All members of the SBOL Development Group are eligible to vote.
  5. Candidates are elected by plurality.

Voting process:

  1. Any member of the SBOL Developers Group can submit an SBOL Enhancement Proposal (SEP) to the editors and/or to the community at large. See SEP #1 for a description of when and how to write and submit an SEP.
  2. The SBOL editors are expected to move a given SEP draft to a vote once they agree that there has been sufficient debate. However, any member of the SBOL Developers Group can initiate the vote as long as one other member of the group seconds the motion.
  3. SBOL Editors post a voting form (see below), for a final discussion period of 2 working days.
  4. Voting runs for 5 working days, starting at the end of the discussion period. All members of the SBOL Development Group are eligible to vote.
  5. The SBOL Editors may extend the voting period by up to an additional 5 working days when they feel that an insufficient number of votes have been obtained.
  6. SBOL Editors tally and call the vote. First vote will be judged by a 67% majority to indicate “rough consensus”.
    1. If rough consensus is not reached, discussion of 3 working days is to follow. SEP authors can modify or withdraw their proposal during that time.
    2. The reasons for decisions must be recorded with the results of the vote.
    3. Any second followup vote will be ruled by 50% majority and will be treated as the decision.

Voting form must:

  1. State clearly the SEP number and title being voted on and provide a link to this SEP.
  2. State the eligibility criteria for voting, “All members of the SBOL Developers Group are eligible to vote.”
  3. Provide the following options for the vote:
    • accept — vote to accept the SEP
    • reject — vote to reject the SEP
    • abstain — no opinion, abstain votes will not be counted when determining majorities
    • defer / table for further discussion — keep the SEP in draft stage so that it can be again put to a vote after further discussion and amendment (in contrast to “abstain” this vote will be counted when determining majorities).